Testimony by Cardinal Schonborn - Medjugorje-mir,mir,mir

Search the Site
Guests Online
Go to content

Main menu:

Testimony by Cardinal Schonborn

Cardinal Schornborn

Vienna Cardinal Schonborn spoke to the pilgrims in Medjugorje on, Dec 30, at 3p.m.
Read More and View video. Read Interview  Cardinal Shonborn's Homily

Testimony by Cardinal Schonborn Sept 2010.

Cardinal Schonborn on Standing by Medjugorje and Church Doctrine "It is my duty"
By Daniel Klimek  September 30, 2010

The Catechism of the Catholic Church is the official text of the teachings of the Catholic Church and Cardinal Schönborn the Archbishop of Vienna has gained international prominence for his work as Director of the Catechism of the Catholic Church - the greatest single reference work on Catholic doctrine today.
"Praise be Jesus and Mary! Dear Ivan and Marija, thank you that you came again! Thank you for your service for so many years. "
- Cardinal Christoph von Schonborn to the visionaries of Medjugorje at St. Stephen's  Cathedral, September 23, 2010

Ever since Cardinal Christoph von Schonborn, the popular Archbishop of Vienna and a leading intellectual within the Catholic Church, made a personal pilgrimage to Medjugorje last year, he has received both praise and criticism for his spiritual journey. Devotees of Medjugorje have praised him for supporting the reported apparitions while critics of Medjugorje have vilified him for the same reason. Cardinal Schonborn's curiosity and wonder for the events taking place at Medjugorje has been expressed in numerous ways - from his pilgrimage to the Bosnian village to public comments he has made about the apparitions in interviews and formal appearances, to the fact that he has approved the presence of two Medjugorje visionaries in his cathedral at Vienna.

Recently, this month, Cardinal Schonborn granted his approval to Marija Pavlovic-Lunetti and Ivan Dragicevic, two of Medjugorje's visionaries, to share their apparitions and testimonies in St. Stephen's Cathedral in Vienna but importantly the Cardinal was not the "official organizer" of the event . Dr. Christian Stelzer from Australia was responsible for bringing the visionaries to St. Stephen Cathedral - in line with official Church rules regarding Medjugorje.
On September 23, 2010, St. Stephen's Cathedral in Vienna Austria was packed - people came from near and far to be there, many had to stand due to the overflowing response, as the visionaries shared their apparitions and testimonies with thousands of people who have renewed their Catholic faith, their love for Christ, His Mother and His Church, through Medjugorje. Tens of thousands also shared the experience around the world, as the event was filmed and streamed live through the work of MaryTV at www.marytv.tv.

As a result of such activities over the past few years, allowing Medjugorje visionaries in his Cathedral and visiting their village, certain critics of Cardinal Schonborn have attacked him as being "disobedient"  and irresponsible to the local bishop of Mostar-Duvno, Ratko Peric-who has opposed the apparitions in Medjugorje-and, consequently, as being "disobedient"  and irresponsible to the Church.
Prominent Catholic Columnist for Beliefnet.com Greg Kandra and author of a recent online article titled "Someone should alert Cardinal Schonborn" wrote to us and said:  "I think the Cardinal is being irresponsible in his very public support for an "apparition" that has not been approved by the Church, and I would caution all faithful Catholics to tread carefully on the issue of Medjugorje."    What such criticisms ignore, however-whether deliberately or out of mere misunderstanding-is the Church's official position on Medjugorje, which is found in documents issued by the Holy See and which clearly distances itself from Bishop Peric's position on Medjugorje, showing that Cardinal Schonborn is the one aligned with Church teaching on the issue.
On May 26, 1998, Archbishop Tarcisio Bertone, then the Secretary to the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the most influential office within the Roman Curia and the one responsible for dealing with reports of private revelations, issued a letter clarifying the Church's official position on Medjugorje. The letter explained:
"What Bishop Peric said in his letter to the Secretary General of 'Famille Chretienne,' declaring: 'My conviction and my position is not only "non constat de supernaturalitate," but likewise, "constat de non supernaturalitate" of the apparitions or revelations in Medjugorje,' should be considered the expression of the personal conviction of the Bishop of Mostar which he has the right to express as Ordinary of the place, but which is and remains his personal opinion."

Bishop Peric, in his personal opinion, has not only been critical of the supernatural quality of Medjugorje, which he downright doubts, but also of pilgrimages to Medjugorje, including Cardinal Schonborn's personal pilgrimage in January 2010. Both of these positions contradict the Vatican's official teaching on Medjugorje. The Holy See is currently investigating the supernaturality of Medjugorje through an international commission, guided by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and headed by Cardinal Camillo Ruini, and has been clear that an official ruling on Medjugorje will come later; thus this is the reason why the Vatican has emphasized that Bishop Peric's premature and negative ruling on Medjugorje constitutes his own personal opinion and nothing official for pilgrims to follow (since the bishop's opinion differs from the Vatican's current position, which remains neutral as investigations continue).

Second, Bishop Peric's critical opinion against pilgrimages to Medjugorje, including Cardinal Schonborn's personal pilgrimage, also contradicts official Church teaching. In his letter, on behalf of the CDF, Cardinal Bertone emphasized: "Finally, as regards pilgrimages to Medjugorje, which are conducted privately, this Congregation points out that they are permitted on condition that they are not regarded as an authentication of events still taking place and which still call for an examination by the Church" (emphasis added). In other words, Cardinal Bertone's letter, which was written when he was Secretary of the CDF under Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the current Pope, stresses that personal pilgrimages to Medjugorje are allowed as long as such trips respect the Church's official position on Medjugorje as the Church continues its investigations (the official position, as mentioned, remains neutral as the Vatican continues all examinations).

In February of 2010, Cardinal Schonborn visited the United States, as he gave a lecture at the Catholic University of America. MinistryValues covered the event live. Both I and colleague Stephen Ryan were present for the Cardinal's visit. When asked about Medjugorje, Cardinal Schonborn emphasized that Medjugorje is an apparition site not yet approved, or disapproved, by the Church and, therefore, we must wait for the Vatican to make its official judgment and respect that judgment once it is made. Notice that Cardinal Schonborn's position is different from Bishop Peric's. Peric has already reached a negative (and quite premature) judgment on Medjugorje, on both the apparitions and pilgrimages there, thus violating the official Church position which permits personal pilgrimages to the site and which has yet to officially declare whether Medjugorje is authentic or inauthentic, emphasizing its neutrality.

Cardinal Schonborn's stance, on the other hand, respects the immense spiritual fruits that are present at Medjugorje while also respecting the Church's official teaching, in terms of his personal pursuits (like the pilgrimage - which, as the CDF clarified, is permitted) and in terms of his official stance (waiting patiently to accept the Church's final position on the apparitions once it is made). When speaking about Medjugorje, Cardinal Schonborn often admits the abundant spiritual fruits that have come as a result of the Bosnian shrine. He often emphasizes, "If I was an opponent of Medjugorje, I would have to close down my seminary since almost all the candidates received their vocations to the priesthood through Medjugorje." And such important spiritual fruits like abundant vocations to the priesthood, which any devout Catholic would acknowledge are indispensible to the Church and the faith, should be nourished and fostered pastorally while maintaining respect for the Church's position. This is exactly what Cardinal Schonborn has been doing. Regarding Cardinal Bertone's letter, on behalf of the CDF, Cardinal Schonborn has commented:

"The letter of Archbishop Bertone to the Bishop of Le Reunion sufficiently makes clear what has always been the official position of the hierarchy during recent years concerning Medjugorje: namely, that it knowingly leaves the matter undecided." The Cardinal elaborated: "There is no doubt that the magisterium of the Church does not make a definite declaration while the extraordinary phenomena are going on in the form of apparitions or other means. Indeed it is the mission of shepherds to promote what is growing, to encourage the fruits which are appearing, to protect them, if need be, from the dangers which are obviously everywhere."

This insight of Cardinal Schonborn-that it is important to protect and nourish the spiritual fruits of Medjugorje, such as the countless priestly vocations and conversions attained there-while respecting the official Church position once it is made, in many ways echoes the words of the great Pope, John Paul II, who also emphasized that it is important to protect Medjugorje and all the good that is happening there.

On June 17, 1992, in the midst of the wars in the former Yugoslavia, Pope John Paul II met with Fr. Jozo Zovko, then the pastor of St. James Parish in Medjugorje. The Holy Father's words to Fr. Jozo were striking. John Paul II declared: "I give you my blessing, take courage. Tell Medjugorje, I am with you. Protect Medjugorje! Protect Our Lady's messages!" The urgency of the Holy Father's words for the protection of Medjugorje, the messages and spiritual fruits contained there, make clear how much the holy site, as to millions of Catholics, meant to him. Like Cardinal Schonborn, the Pope could not ignore the spiritual fruits of Medjugorje. John Paul II once told Bishop Murilo Krieger of Brazil: "Medjugorje, it's the spiritual heart of the world."

On the question of pilgrimages to Medjugorje, the Holy Father agreed that they are permitted years before the Vatican issued a letter on the matter. In June 1986, in response to a group of twelve Italian bishops seeking advice on pilgrims traveling to Medjugorje, John Paul stated: "Let the people go to Medjugorje, if they convert, pray, confess, do penance and fast." Likewise, on March 14, 1989, Pope John Paul II told Bishop S. Treinen, then Bishop of Boise, Idaho, that, "...it's good for pilgrims to go to Medjugorje and pray and do penance. It's good."

Interestingly, Cardinal Schonborn's views on Medjugorje do not only align with Pope John Paul II's views, in recognizing the spiritual fruits, but also with the current pope's views, Benedict XVI. Most people may not know that before becoming Pope Benedict, Joseph Cardinal Ratzinger played a monumental role in protecting Medjugorje and taking the jurisdiction of Medjugorje away from the local bishop.
In April 1986, then Bishop of Mostar, Pavao Zanic, who had an infamous reputation for hostility toward the apparitions and the visionaries of Medjugorje, frequently making slanderous and unsubstantiated remarks against them, traveled to Rome to submit the findings of an episcopal commission he led investigating the events in Medjugorje. Bishop Zanic was more than surprised when he was summoned to a meeting with Cardinal Ratzinger in Rome, then the head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. Cardinal Ratzinger ordered Zanic to suspend his negative judgment on the matter, dissolve his commission, and place the inquiry into the hands of the Vatican. The CDF made sure to free Zanic and his commission from further investigative duties, recognizing that he was not the man to objectively investigate the matter.
In an interview with MinistryValues.com, the renowned Mariologist Dr. Mark Miravalle has commented why Cardinal Ratzinger took these actions against the local bishop, explaining how they are connected to the current investigation in the Vatican:
"I see this [the current Vatican commission investigating Medjugorje] as a continuation of what transpired before, when Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger intervened in 1986 and took the jurisdiction of Medjugorje away from the local bishop of Mostar, Bishop Zanic, placing it into the hands of the Yugoslav Bishops Conference. This was done so Medjugorje could be judged objectively. That's why Medjugorje has recently been placed under an international commission headed by the Holy See, so the apparitions could be judged objectively. I see this as a continuation of the Church's previous actions now. What is most important is Our Lady's wishes. Perhaps local Church authorities not certain of the authenticity of the apparitions at Medjugorje have themselves at times not been in conformity with the Church's process of objective evaluation which therefore calls for ongoing cooperation. Much of the debate surrounding Medjugorje generally results from misunderstandings of official Church position pertaining to Medjugorje, which in light of the 1991 Zadar statement from the ex-Yugoslav conference of bishops, and the May 26, 1998 letter of Archbishop Tarcisio Bertone, then secretary of the CDF, does allow for private pilgrims to go to Medjugorje in good faith and in full obedience to the Magisterium."
Once again, we see how Cardinal Schonborn is fully obedient to the Church's teachings, to the Magisterium, on this issue. It is important to note that when the Cardinal traveled to Medjugorje he did so as a personal pilgrim, as the Magisterium explains should be the case. Once again we also see how accusations that Cardinal Schonborn has been "disobedient" to the Church (as certain critics have alleged) are completely without any merit. For going against the personal opinion of the bishop of Mostar Cardinal Schonborn was not "disobedient" to the Church because the Church has also stood against the local bishop's personal opinion-and emphasized so in a letter written on behalf of the CDF by its Secretary (at the time).
Some critics have even alleged "disobedience" against Cardinal Schonborn for hosting the Medjugorje visionaries in his Cathedral. This accusation merits no validity since an official declaration of "disobedience" is something that the Church takes seriously and dedicates investigations to-of course none of which have transpired. Yet, to justify this allegation, some critics have pointed to a memo written by Bishop Peter Sertain of Joliet, Illinois. The bishop's memo, addressed to the priests of his diocese, states:
"From time to time we are approached by parishioners who would like to invite speakers representing various alleged apparitions of the Blessed Virgin, private revelations or locutions, or others claiming to possess extraordinary spiritual gifts. My purpose in bringing this to your attention is to ask that you not issue such invitations. Whether the speakers would make presentations on well-known alleged apparitions, such as Medjugorje, or lesser known private revelations, we must be extremely cautious about inviting or promoting them."   
There are a few reasons as to why this memo has no effect on Cardinal Schonborn and his invitation to the Medjugorje visionaries to come to Vienna. First, the Bishop of Joliet, Illinois, has no jurisdiction over the spiritual activities that transpire in Vienna, Austria, not to mention over Cardinal Schonborn. Second, the memo was addressed directly to the priests of Joliet, Illinois, and thus is the only place where it could contain any validity for that is the only place where Bishop Sertain holds jurisdiction. Third, the memo, in many ways as is the case with Bishop Peric of Mostar, constitutes the bishop's personal opinion and does not reflect the teachings of the Holy See, of the Church in Rome (this is why the bishop uses his language very carefully in the memo, stating that he is asking his priests not to issue any invitations to any reported seers or mystics - "My purpose in bringing this to your attention is to ask that you do not issue such invitations" - emphasis added). Of course the bishop cannot make an infallible statement for only the Bishop of Rome, the Pope, has that right in the Roman Catholic tradition.
Thus far it seems like Cardinal Schonborn has been fully in line with the Popes' teachings on Medjugorje. Pope Benedict XVI, when he was the head of the CDF and known as Cardinal Ratzinger, took the jurisdiction over Medjugorje away from the local bishop so the apparitions could be judged objectively. Cardinal Schonborn has clearly respected this move and indeed the Archbishop of Vienna, Cardinal Schonborn, was in attendance with the visionaries but not as the organizer and not, for that matter, for the apparitions. He came to be with the Visonaries at the scheduled adoration of Our Savior.  He attended officially as a  neutral observer all the while recognizing - even honoring  -the great fruits of Medjugorje as other great men before him have done  as well.
As the crowds thinned and as the broadcast equipment was being gathered, Cardinal Schonborn, still milling around the Cathedral  thanked Tom Matasso , the Mary TV technical expert ,for his work.  Tom Matasso then  thanked Cardinal Schonborn  for standing by Medjugorje... the Cardinal replied, "It is my duty!"
"It is my duty!" - Such an interesting statement from a humble brilliant man.  Indeed it is Cardinal Schonborn's duty to stand by his Church he so dearly loves and also to  "stand by" Medjugorje because it is also what the Church has asked him to do as well.

Testimony by Cardinal Schonborn

Back to content | Back to main menu